欢迎来到星沙英语网

LSAT 考试|LSAT综合辅导:LSAT考试范本08

来源:www.jiankexinxi.com 2024-05-28
Clearly, government has a responsibility to support the arts. However, if that support is going to produce anything of value, government must place no restrictions2 on the art that is produced.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with the opinion expressed above? Develop your position by giving specific reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading. (国家和艺术的关系)

The speaker argues that government must support the arts but at the same time impose no control over what art is produced. The implicit3 rationale for government intervention4 in the arts is that, without it, cultural decline and erosion of our social fabric5 will result. However, I find no empirical evidence to support this argument, which in any event is unconvincing in light of more persuasive6 arguments that government should play no part in either supporting or restricting the arts.

First, subsidizing the arts is neither a proper nor necessary job for government. Although public health is generally viewed as critical to a society's very survival and therefore an appropriate concern of government, this concern should not extend tenuously7 to our cultural health or well-being8. A lack of private funding might justify9 an exception: in my observation; however, philanthropy is alive and well today, especially among the new technology and media moguls.

Second, government cannot possibly play an evenhanded role as arts patron. Inadequate10 resources call for restrictions; priorities, and choices, it is unconscionable to relegate11 normative decisions as to which art has value to a few legislators and jurists, who may be unenlightened in their notions about art. Also, legislators are all too likely to make choices in favor of the cultural agendas of those lobbyists with the most money and influence. Third, restricting artistic12 expression may in some cases encroach upon the constitutional right of free expression. In any case, governmental restriction1 may chill creativity, thereby13 defeating the very purpose of subsidizing the arts.

In the final analysis, government cannot philosophically14 or economically justify its involvement in the arts, either by subsidy15 or sanction. Responsibility lies with inpiduals to determine what art has value and to support that art。


相关文章推荐

02

02

LSAT 考试|LSAT方法技巧:聚焦LSAT剖析推理

focus on logic1 games不过是逻辑游戏罢了 nothing inspires more fear in the hearts of lsat* test takers than analytical2 reasoning

12

21

LSAT 考试|LSAT模拟考试:LSAT模拟考试TEST3逻

7. When inpidual students are all treated equally in that they have identical exposure to curriculum material, the rate,

12

21

LSAT 考试|LSAT考试试题TEST2-1a

Section IITime-35 minutes24 QuestionsDirections: The questions in this section are based on the reasoning contained in b

11

02

LSAT 考试|LSAT模拟考试:LSAT模拟考试TEST2阅

The Constitution of the United States does not explicitly2 define the extent of the President's authority to involve Uni

11

02

LSAT 考试|LSAT模拟考试:LSAT模拟考试TEST2阅

The human species came into being at the time of the greatest biological persity in the history of the Earth. Today, as

09

16

LSAT 考试|LSAT的逻辑组题及参考答案(2)

Question 7-12 Four lions-F, G, H, J-and two tigers-K and M-will be assigned to exactly six stalls, one animal per stall.

09

16

LSAT 考试|LSAT模拟考试:LSAT模拟考试TEST3逻

19. The efficiency of microwave ovens in destroying the harmful bacteria frequently found in common foods is diminished

09

15

LSAT 考试|LSAT模拟考试:LSAT模拟考试TEST6逻

11. Some critics claim that it is unfair that so many great works of art are housed in huge metropolitan1 museums, since

08

13

LSAT 考试|LSAT考试试题:LSAT考试模拟试题一b

5. The passage suggests that both Waugh and Oakes consider James's novels to have too much material that is extraneous1

08

13

LSAT 考试|LSAT的逻辑组题(二)a

Time-35minutes 24Questions Questions1-6 Sevenstudents-fourth-yearstudentsKimandLee;third-yearstudentsPat andRobin:andsec